Danilo Radovic

Danilo Radovic

PG

Boston Crusaders · Primary Ballhandler / Point Of Attack

Bijelo Polje, Montenegro

Electrifying facilitating guard

A rotation point guard averaging 6.7 PPG, 1.9 RPG, 5.1 APG. Excels in ball handling (20 rating, 100th pctl), perimeter defense (19 rating, 99th pctl) and three-point shooting (19 rating, 99th pctl). Limited by finishing (8 rating, 5th pctl) and ball dominance (8 rating, 15th pctl).

46
Impact
51
Future
3.5
CA
3.0
PA
22
Age
$6.5M
Salary
3.160
Bal WV

Skill Badges

(10)
O Ankle Breaker (S) O Sniper (S) O Shot Creator (S) O Floor General (B) O Catch & Shoot (B) O Gravity Generator (B) O Floater Game (B) D Help Defender (B) D Pick Dodger (B) D Clamps (B)
Marcus Smart
NBA Comparison
Marcus Smart
2022-23
72%
Style
72%
Level
6'3" · 220lbs
11.5/3.1/6.3 (PPG/RPG/APG)
Elite playmaker 3PT specialist Lockdown defender Ball handler
Alt comp
Kyle Lowry
2021-22 · 71%
2050 Projection
Peak Ridge: 13.7
Stage: Developing
Peak Age: 29 (8yr away)
Future Value: 51
Stat Value Pctl
Per Game
PPG 6.7 37
RPG 1.9 28
APG 5.1 88
SPG 1.2 72
BPG 0.1 33
MPG 20.6 48
Shooting
FG% 0.425 23
3P% 0.308 32
FT% 0.829 53
TS% 0.534 22
Impact
Impact 46 37
Off Impact 51 57
Def Impact 43 22
Advanced
Player Efficiency Rating 14.8 53
WS 1.9 38
Box Score Impact 0.8 59
Value Over Replacement 0.6 52
Positional BSI 0.23 +0.57

Strengths & Weaknesses (Win Model)

Strengths
On-Ball Perimeter Defense 19 (coef=0.0330)
3PT Shooting 19 (coef=0.0196)
Passing 19 (coef=0.0156)
Inside Shooting 19 (coef=0.0155)
Spacing 14 (coef=0.0196)
Weaknesses
Post Defense 3 (coef=0.0333)
Defensive Rebounding 6 (coef=0.0226)
Rim Protection 2 (coef=0.0168)
Offensive Rebounding 6 (coef=0.0160)
Ball Dominance 8 (coef=0.0152)

Expected vs Actual Production

Stat Actual Expected Delta
PPG 6.7 9.5 -2.8
RPG 1.9 1.3 +0.6
APG 5.1 4.3 +0.8
SPG 1.2 0.7 +0.5
BPG 0.1 0.1 +0.0
TPG - 1.0
FG% 0.425 0.5 -0.0
3P% 0.308 0.4 -0.1
FT% 0.829 0.5 +0.4

Play Style

Driving Frequency
77:23%

Positional Fit

Guard 80%
Wing 80%
Big 50%

Player Impact Breakdown

Average score driven by modest Win Model Score.

46 / 100 #293 of 435
On-Court Impact — 60% weight -0.21z
On-Court Impact -0.47 (Off -0.67, Def +0.20)
Win-Model Ratings — 25% weight -0.44z
Win Model Score: 3.1460
Hidden Intangibles — 15% weight +0.00z
Hidden Rating Impact: +0.0000 (actual vs predicted from ratings)
Offense
51
#209
Defense
43
#352
Confidence
70%
782 min
Position Model (PG)
Predicted Positional BSI: 0.23 Actual: 0.8 +0.57
Outperforming PG model predictions

Future Value

Forward-looking complement to Impact Score — who will be valuable going forward, factoring in age, contract efficiency, and development trajectory.

51 / 100 #243 of 450
Cumulative Wins — 50% weight 48
Peak Ceiling — 20% weight 47
Contract Surplus — 30% weight 59
Future Value above current Impact (46) — trajectory is positive

League Percentile Profile

PPG
24
TS%
16
BPM
56
WS/48
66
RAPM
4
USG%
23
PA/100
30
BCI
91

Shot Quality

PA/100
-4.53
Points Added
-10.7
Selection
0.973
FGA
236
Zone Breakdown
Short Midrange
36.4%
33 FGA (14%)
Long Midrange
36.4%
11 FGA (5%)
Above Break Three
30.3%
109 FGA (46%)
Rim
53.0%
83 FGA (35%)

Creation & Scoring Load

Box Creation
21.65
Load Tier
Poor
Eff Delta
-4.1%
USG%
15.3%
Tendencies
Salary
$6.5M
Years Left
2
Expiry
2052
Option
None
Status
-
Trade Value
0.377

Contract Breakdown

Season Salary Notes
2050-51 $6,500,000
2051-52 $6,500,000
Total Owed $13,000,000

Win Model Development

Win Model Score
3.146
Expected WM
3.088
Dev Residual
+0.0580
Peak Age
30
Peak Win Model
3.673
PA Tier
Medium
Upside Gap
-0.5
Dev Status
Ahead of Curve
Win Model Score = sum(rating × coefficient) from multi-season Ridge regression (n=393, 11 seasons, 12/32 stable coefficients). Defense and shooting dominate. Unbiased across positions.

Win Model Trajectory

Most Similar Players

Player Team Age CA Similarity Archetype
O
Omari Swift Baltimore Bullets 21 3.5 98.6% Shot Creator / Point Of Attack
M
Mandela Marsh-Kittrell Baltimore Bullets 25 4.5 98.5% Shot Creator / Point Of Attack
T
Tyrique Beaudean Denver Dragons 24 3.5 98.3% Primary Ballhandler / Point Of Attack
I
Isaiah Voss Washington Pilots 0 3.5 98.2% Primary Ballhandler / Point Of Attack
F
Flynn Barker Las Vegas Scorpions 21 3.5 98.1% Shot Creator / Point Of Attack

Predicted Archetype

Offensive
Defensive

Win Value Development

Stage
Developing
Peak Age
29
Peak Win Value
13.7
Years to Peak
8
Current Win Value
12.0
Confidence
HIGH

Win Value Trajectory

Empirical Dev Curve (Multiverse)

Current WV
2.350
Projected Peak WV
2.674
Peak Age
29
Years to Peak
7
WV Growth
+0.324

Rating Trainability

Rating Current Growth/yr Class Peak Age
Foul Drawing 15 +1.23 High Growth 31
Help Defense 17 +0.66 High Growth 27
Off-Ball Defense 14 +0.55 High Growth 28
Ball Dominance 8 +0.55 High Growth 28
Gravity 13 +0.52 High Growth 29
Spacing 14 +0.45 High Growth 18
Post Execution 2 +0.40 High Growth 29
Playmaking 13 +0.40 High Growth 29
Stealing 9 +0.38 High Growth 19
Finishing 8 +0.37 High Growth 27
Defensive Rebounding 6 +0.37 High Growth 18
Offensive Rebounding 6 +0.36 High Growth 18
Strength 8 +0.35 High Growth 18
Pick & Roll Execution 9 +0.34 High Growth 18
Passing 19 +0.33 High Growth 18
Self-Creation 18 +0.32 High Growth 19
Isolation Execution 11 +0.32 High Growth 18
3PT Shooting 19 +0.31 High Growth 19
Ball Handling 20 +0.30 High Growth 19
On-Ball Perimeter Defense 19 +0.30 High Growth 18
Shoot Off Dribble 17 +0.28 Moderate Growth 18
Rim Protection 2 +0.26 Moderate Growth 18
Inside Shooting 19 +0.25 Moderate Growth 18
Post Defense 3 +0.17 Moderate Growth 18
Basketball IQ 16 +0.07 Low Growth 19
Endurance 8 +0.05 Low Growth 20
Speed 15 +0.01 Low Growth 18
Free Throws 15 +0.00 Unknown -
First Step 14 -0.01 Low Growth 18
Mid-Range Shooting 16 -0.03 Low Growth 19
Quickness 15 -0.08 Low Growth 19
Athleticism 11 -0.08 Low Growth 19
← Back to Roster