Dashboard›JBL Players›Jack Meyer
Jack Meyer

Jack Meyer

PF

Washington Pilots · Versatile Big / Mobile Big

College: Kentucky · Louisville, Kentucky

Physical paint-anchoring forward

A rotation power forward averaging 13.0 PPG, 10.1 RPG, 1.2 APG. Excels in isolation scoring (20 rating, 100th pctl), defensive rebounding (19 rating, 99th pctl) and post execution (19 rating, 99th pctl). Limited by mid-range shooting (2 rating, 3rd pctl) and speed (4 rating, 18th pctl).

44
Impact
55
Future
4.5
CA
2.5
PA
27
Age
$10.5M
Salary
3.679
Bal WV

Skill Badges

(7)
O Post Hub (S) O Floater Game (B) O Iso Scorer (B) O Glass Cleaner (B) D Rim Eraser (S) D Paint Wall (S) D Help Defender (B)
Jarrett Allen
NBA Comparison
Jarrett Allen
2024-25
84%
Style
84%
Level
6'11" · 243lbs
14.0/10.0/1.5 (PPG/RPG/APG)
Rim protector Rebounder Free throw merchant Defensive anchor
Alt comp
Evan Mobley
2024-25 · 78%
2050 Projection
Peak Ridge: 13.0
Stage: Developing
Peak Age: 29 (2yr away)
Future Value: 55
Stat Value Pctl
Per Game
PPG 13.0 70
RPG 10.1 95
APG 1.2 38
SPG 1.0 64
BPG 2.2 97
MPG 32.5 89
Shooting
FG% 0.511 75
3P% 0.25 23
FT% 0.909 91
TS% 0.599 70
Impact
Impact 44 28
Off Impact 39 15
Def Impact 48 43
Advanced
Player Efficiency Rating 16.0 65
WS 6.7 87
Box Score Impact -0.5 42
Value Over Replacement 1.0 63
Positional BSI -0.36 -0.14

Strengths & Weaknesses (Win Model)

Strengths
Post Defense 16 (coef=0.0333)
Defensive Rebounding 19 (coef=0.0226)
Rim Protection 19 (coef=0.0168)
Inside Shooting 19 (coef=0.0155)
Ball Dominance 15 (coef=0.0152)
Weaknesses
On-Ball Perimeter Defense 9 (coef=0.0330)
3PT Shooting 10 (coef=0.0196)
Spacing 4 (coef=0.0196)
Passing 10 (coef=0.0156)
Stealing 10 (coef=0.0145)

Expected vs Actual Production

Stat Actual Expected Delta
PPG 13.0 15.2 -2.2
RPG 10.1 9.3 +0.8
APG 1.2 2.6 -1.4
SPG 1.0 0.8 +0.2
BPG 2.2 1.7 +0.5
TPG - 1.6
FG% 0.511 0.5 -0.0
3P% 0.25 0.3 -0.0
FT% 0.909 0.5 +0.5

Play Style

Driving Frequency
31:69%

Positional Fit

Guard 50%
Wing 80%
Big 90%

Player Impact Breakdown

Below-average score driven by weak On-Court Impact. Elite ratings haven't translated to on-court impact.

44 / 100 #329 of 435
On-Court Impact — 60% weight -1.24z
On-Court Impact -3.02 (Off -1.76, Def -1.25)
Win-Model Ratings — 25% weight +0.75z
Win Model Score: 3.6628
Hidden Intangibles — 15% weight +0.00z
Hidden Rating Impact: +0.0000 (actual vs predicted from ratings)
Offense
39
#378
Defense
48
#264
Confidence
100%
2665 min
Position Model (PF)
Predicted Positional BSI: -0.36 Actual: -0.5 -0.14
Performing in line with PF model predictions

Future Value

Forward-looking complement to Impact Score — who will be valuable going forward, factoring in age, contract efficiency, and development trajectory.

55 / 100 #187 of 450
Cumulative Wins — 50% weight 54
Peak Ceiling — 20% weight 54
Contract Surplus — 30% weight 55
Future Value above current Impact (44) — trajectory is positive

League Percentile Profile

PPG
63
TS%
69
BPM
39
WS/48
68
RAPM
15
USG%
29
PA/100
29
BCI
19

Shot Quality

PA/100
-4.95
Points Added
-43.4
Selection
0.942
FGA
876
Zone Breakdown
Rim
52.7%
514 FGA (59%)
Short Midrange
31.9%
273 FGA (31%)
Above Break Three
25.0%
48 FGA (6%)
Other
50.0%
2 FGA (0%)
Long Midrange
35.9%
39 FGA (4%)

Creation & Scoring Load

Box Creation
4.44
Load Tier
Good
Eff Delta
+2.4%
USG%
16.3%
Tendencies
Salary
$10.5M
Years Left
2
Expiry
2052
Option
None
Status
-
Trade Value
0.411

Contract Breakdown

Season Salary Notes
2050-51 $10,500,000
2051-52 $10,500,000
Total Owed $21,000,000

Win Model Development

Win Model Score
3.663
Expected WM
3.600
Dev Residual
+0.0624
Peak Age
31
Peak Win Model
3.836
PA Tier
Low
Upside Gap
-2.0
Dev Status
Ahead of Curve
Win Model Score = sum(rating × coefficient) from multi-season Ridge regression (n=393, 11 seasons, 12/32 stable coefficients). Defense and shooting dominate. Unbiased across positions.

Win Model Trajectory

Most Similar Players

Player Team Age CA Similarity Archetype
S
Steve Comino Vancouver Wolves 27 4.5 98.6% Versatile Big / Mobile Big
G
Gvidas Vitenas Dallas Predators 28 4.5 98.4% Versatile Big / Helper
J
Jamaya Patton Indiana Stonecutters 23 4.5 98.1% Versatile Big / Mobile Big
I
Ilker Vick Nashville Stars 0 3.5 97.7% Versatile Big / Mobile Big
R
Rayvon Nassar Phoenix Vultures 22 3.5 97.4% Versatile Big / Mobile Big

Predicted Archetype

Offensive
Defensive

Win Value Development

Stage
Developing
Peak Age
29
Peak Win Value
13.0
Years to Peak
2
Current Win Value
12.7
Confidence
MEDIUM

Win Value Trajectory

Empirical Dev Curve (Multiverse)

Current WV
2.738
Projected Peak WV
2.818
Peak Age
29
Years to Peak
2
WV Growth
+0.081

Rating Trainability

Rating Current Growth/yr Class Peak Age
Foul Drawing 15 +1.23 High Growth 31
Help Defense 18 +0.66 High Growth 27
Off-Ball Defense 13 +0.55 High Growth 28
Ball Dominance 15 +0.55 High Growth 28
Gravity 14 +0.52 High Growth 29
Spacing 4 +0.45 High Growth 18
Post Execution 19 +0.40 High Growth 29
Playmaking 12 +0.40 High Growth 29
Stealing 10 +0.38 High Growth 19
Finishing 13 +0.37 High Growth 27
Defensive Rebounding 19 +0.37 High Growth 18
Offensive Rebounding 13 +0.36 High Growth 18
Strength 16 +0.35 High Growth 18
Pick & Roll Execution 11 +0.34 High Growth 18
Passing 10 +0.33 High Growth 18
Self-Creation 14 +0.32 High Growth 19
Isolation Execution 20 +0.32 High Growth 18
3PT Shooting 10 +0.31 High Growth 19
Ball Handling 7 +0.30 High Growth 19
On-Ball Perimeter Defense 9 +0.30 High Growth 18
Shoot Off Dribble 7 +0.28 Moderate Growth 18
Rim Protection 19 +0.26 Moderate Growth 18
Inside Shooting 19 +0.25 Moderate Growth 18
Post Defense 16 +0.17 Moderate Growth 18
Basketball IQ 17 +0.07 Low Growth 19
Endurance 12 +0.05 Low Growth 20
Speed 4 +0.01 Low Growth 18
Free Throws 17 +0.00 Unknown -
First Step 10 -0.01 Low Growth 18
Mid-Range Shooting 2 -0.03 Low Growth 19
Quickness 10 -0.08 Low Growth 19
Athleticism 13 -0.08 Low Growth 19
← Back to Roster