Alzee Sessoms

Alzee Sessoms

PG

Cleveland Giants · Primary Ballhandler / Point Of Attack

College: Kansas · American Fork, Utah

Smooth shoot-and-defend guard

An elite two-way point guard averaging 15.5 PPG, 2.8 RPG, 9.8 APG. Excels in interior scoring (20 rating, 100th pctl), mid-range shooting (19 rating, 100th pctl) and perimeter defense (20 rating, 100th pctl). Limited by foul drawing (7 rating, 5th pctl) and defensive rebounding (5 rating, 10th pctl).

77
Impact
56
Future
5.0
CA
3.0
PA
28
Age
$22.5M
Salary
3.638
Bal WV

Skill Badges

(18)
O Iso Scorer (S) O Pop Threat (S) O Catch & Shoot (S) O Pull-Up Threat (S) O Floater Game (S) O Ankle Breaker (S) O Sniper (S) O Shot Creator (S) O Gravity Generator (S) O PnR Maestro (B) O Lob Threat (B) O Posterizer (B) O Floor General (B) O Slasher (B) D Clamps (S) D Interceptor (S) D Pick Dodger (S) D Help Defender (B)
NBA Comparison
Tyrese Haliburton
2024-25
75%
Style
75%
Level
6'5" · 185lbs
17.0/4.0/9.0 (PPG/RPG/APG)
Elite playmaker 3PT specialist Lockdown defender Ball handler
Alt comp
Trae Young
2024-25 · 63%
2050 Projection
Peak Ridge: 13.8
Stage: Developing
Peak Age: 29 (2yr away)
Future Value: 56
Stat Value Pctl
Per Game
PPG 15.5 80
RPG 2.8 43
APG 9.8 100
SPG 2.1 100
BPG 0.1 33
MPG 34.4 99
Shooting
FG% 0.447 38
3P% 0.382 66
FT% 0.787 37
TS% 0.562 41
Impact
Impact 77 98
Off Impact 63 89
Def Impact 84 99
Advanced
Player Efficiency Rating 18.4 86
WS 9.5 97
Box Score Impact 1.7 69
Value Over Replacement 2.6 86
Positional BSI 1.95 -0.25

Strengths & Weaknesses (Win Model)

Strengths
On-Ball Perimeter Defense 20 (coef=0.0330)
3PT Shooting 19 (coef=0.0196)
Spacing 17 (coef=0.0196)
Inside Shooting 20 (coef=0.0155)
Ball Dominance 19 (coef=0.0152)
Weaknesses
Post Defense 3 (coef=0.0333)
Defensive Rebounding 5 (coef=0.0226)
Rim Protection 3 (coef=0.0168)
First Step 7 (coef=0.0112)
Foul Drawing 7 (coef=0.0102)

Expected vs Actual Production

Stat Actual Expected Delta
PPG 15.5 19.1 -3.6
RPG 2.8 3.6 -0.8
APG 9.8 6.0 +3.8
SPG 2.1 1.6 +0.5
BPG 0.1 0.5 -0.4
TPG - 2.0
FG% 0.447 0.5 -0.0
3P% 0.382 0.4 -0.0
FT% 0.787 0.5 +0.3

Play Style

Driving Frequency
17:83%

Positional Fit

Guard 90%
Wing 90%
Big 60%

Player Impact Breakdown

Star-level score driven by exceptional On-Court Impact. On-court impact exceeds what ratings alone would predict. Defense is the primary value driver.

77 / 100 #9 of 435
On-Court Impact — 60% weight +2.21z
On-Court Impact +5.50 (Off -0.18, Def +5.59)
Win-Model Ratings — 25% weight +0.93z
Win Model Score: 3.6185
Hidden Intangibles — 15% weight +0.00z
Hidden Rating Impact: +0.0000 (actual vs predicted from ratings)
Offense
63
#60
Defense
84
#5
Confidence
100%
2786 min
Position Model (PG)
Predicted Positional BSI: 1.95 Actual: 1.7 -0.25
Performing in line with PG model predictions

Future Value

Forward-looking complement to Impact Score — who will be valuable going forward, factoring in age, contract efficiency, and development trajectory.

56 / 100 #148 of 450
Cumulative Wins — 50% weight 64
Peak Ceiling — 20% weight 64
Contract Surplus — 30% weight 36
Future Value well below current Impact (77) — likely declining asset

League Percentile Profile

PPG
75
TS%
37
BPM
65
WS/48
91
RAPM
98
USG%
52
PA/100
69
BCI
98

Shot Quality

PA/100
+3.51
Points Added
+45.4
Selection
0.973
FGA
1291
Zone Breakdown
Rim
46.6%
401 FGA (31%)
Above Break Three
37.8%
576 FGA (45%)
Long Midrange
54.7%
117 FGA (9%)
Short Midrange
37.1%
197 FGA (15%)

Creation & Scoring Load

Box Creation
24.69
Load Tier
Below Average
Eff Delta
-1.4%
USG%
19.5%
Tendencies
Salary
$22.5M
Years Left
2
Expiry
2052
Option
None
Status
-
Trade Value
0.635

Contract Breakdown

Season Salary Notes
2050-51 $22,500,000 Re-signed with Cleveland Giants
2051-52 $22,500,000
Total Owed $45,000,000

Win Model Development

Win Model Score
3.619
Expected WM
3.499
Dev Residual
+0.1197
Peak Age
30
Peak Win Model
3.735
PA Tier
Medium
Upside Gap
-2.0
Dev Status
Ahead of Curve
Win Model Score = sum(rating × coefficient) from multi-season Ridge regression (n=393, 11 seasons, 12/32 stable coefficients). Defense and shooting dominate. Unbiased across positions.

Win Model Trajectory

Most Similar Players

Player Team Age CA Similarity Archetype
C
Cayden Ward Portland Lumberjacks 24 4.5 99.2% Primary Ballhandler / Point Of Attack
S
Scoochie Hope Atlanta Devils 27 5.0 98.9% Secondary Creator / Wing Stopper
J
Jamaria Flagg Charlotte Drones 28 5.0 98.4% Primary Ballhandler / Point Of Attack
M
Malik Jefferson Toronto Huskies 21 4.0 98.3% Secondary Creator / Wing Stopper
B
Bryce McAlister Portland Lumberjacks 26 4.0 98.3% Primary Ballhandler / Point Of Attack

Predicted Archetype

Offensive
Defensive

Win Value Development

Stage
Developing
Peak Age
29
Peak Win Value
13.8
Years to Peak
2
Current Win Value
13.7
Confidence
HIGH

Win Value Trajectory

Empirical Dev Curve (Multiverse)

Current WV
2.652
Projected Peak WV
2.679
Peak Age
29
Years to Peak
1
WV Growth
+0.027

Rating Trainability

Rating Current Growth/yr Class Peak Age
Foul Drawing 7 +1.23 High Growth 31
Help Defense 17 +0.66 High Growth 27
Off-Ball Defense 19 +0.55 High Growth 28
Ball Dominance 19 +0.55 High Growth 28
Gravity 17 +0.52 High Growth 29
Spacing 17 +0.45 High Growth 18
Post Execution 9 +0.40 High Growth 29
Playmaking 15 +0.40 High Growth 29
Stealing 18 +0.38 High Growth 19
Finishing 19 +0.37 High Growth 27
Defensive Rebounding 5 +0.37 High Growth 18
Offensive Rebounding 10 +0.36 High Growth 18
Strength 17 +0.35 High Growth 18
Pick & Roll Execution 18 +0.34 High Growth 18
Passing 17 +0.33 High Growth 18
Self-Creation 19 +0.32 High Growth 19
Isolation Execution 19 +0.32 High Growth 18
3PT Shooting 19 +0.31 High Growth 19
Ball Handling 18 +0.30 High Growth 19
On-Ball Perimeter Defense 20 +0.30 High Growth 18
Shoot Off Dribble 18 +0.28 Moderate Growth 18
Rim Protection 3 +0.26 Moderate Growth 18
Inside Shooting 20 +0.25 Moderate Growth 18
Post Defense 3 +0.17 Moderate Growth 18
Basketball IQ 16 +0.07 Low Growth 19
Endurance 13 +0.05 Low Growth 20
Speed 17 +0.01 Low Growth 18
Free Throws 15 +0.00 Unknown -
First Step 7 -0.01 Low Growth 18
Mid-Range Shooting 19 -0.03 Low Growth 19
Quickness 17 -0.08 Low Growth 19
Athleticism 13 -0.08 Low Growth 19
← Back to Roster