Dashboard›JBL Players›Anfernee Cummings
Anfernee Cummings

Anfernee Cummings

PG

Cleveland Giants · Primary Ballhandler / Point Of Attack

College: Vanderbilt · Elgin, Oklahoma

Athletic lockdown guard

A rotation point guard averaging 8.7 PPG, 1.3 RPG, 2.8 APG. Excels in free throws (19 rating, 99th pctl), athleticism (17 rating, 93rd pctl) and first step (16 rating, 88th pctl). Limited by post defense (1 rating, 5th pctl) and rim protection (1 rating, 7th pctl).

45
Impact
48
Future
3.0
CA
3.5
PA
20
Age
$3.4M
Salary
2.900
Bal WV

Skill Badges

(4)
O Sniper (B) O Catch & Shoot (B) O Gravity Generator (B) O Slasher (B)
Immanuel Quickley
NBA Comparison
Immanuel Quickley
2024-25
61%
Style
61%
Level
6'3" · 190lbs
15.5/4.5/6.5 (PPG/RPG/APG)
3PT specialist Lockdown defender Ball handler
Alt comp
Malik Monk
2024-25 · 68%
2050 Projection
Peak Ridge: 15.1
Stage: Developing
Peak Age: 29 (10yr away)
Future Value: 48
Stat Value Pctl
Per Game
PPG 8.7 51
RPG 1.3 17
APG 2.8 65
SPG 1.1 68
BPG 0.1 33
MPG 18.0 42
Shooting
FG% 0.404 14
3P% 0.304 31
FT% 0.911 91
TS% 0.529 18
Impact
Impact 45 33
Off Impact 51 57
Def Impact 42 19
Advanced
Player Efficiency Rating 15.7 63
WS 1.1 28
Box Score Impact 0.9 60
Value Over Replacement 0.3 44
Positional BSI -1.59 +2.49

Strengths & Weaknesses (Win Model)

Strengths
On-Ball Perimeter Defense 16 (coef=0.0330)
Spacing 16 (coef=0.0196)
Ball Dominance 16 (coef=0.0152)
Stealing 15 (coef=0.0145)
First Step 16 (coef=0.0112)
Weaknesses
Post Defense 1 (coef=0.0333)
Defensive Rebounding 5 (coef=0.0226)
Rim Protection 1 (coef=0.0168)
Offensive Rebounding 7 (coef=0.0160)
Inside Shooting 15 (coef=0.0155)

Expected vs Actual Production

Stat Actual Expected Delta
PPG 8.7 8.8 -0.1
RPG 1.3 0.4 +0.9
APG 2.8 2.8 +0.0
SPG 1.1 0.9 +0.2
BPG 0.1 -0.1 +0.2
TPG - 1.0
FG% 0.404 0.5 -0.1
3P% 0.304 0.3 -0.0
FT% 0.911 0.4 +0.5

Play Style

Driving Frequency
23:77%

Positional Fit

Guard 80%
Wing 80%
Big 40%

Player Impact Breakdown

Limited to 468 min — score regressed toward league average.

45 / 100 #312 of 435
On-Court Impact — 60% weight -0.12z
On-Court Impact -0.24 (Off -0.13, Def -0.13)
Win-Model Ratings — 25% weight -1.34z
Win Model Score: 2.8855
Hidden Intangibles — 15% weight +0.00z
Hidden Rating Impact: +0.0000 (actual vs predicted from ratings)
Offense
51
#209
Defense
42
#358
Confidence
48%
468 min
Position Model (PG)
Predicted Positional BSI: -1.59 Actual: 0.9 +2.49
Significantly outperforming PG model predictions

Future Value

Forward-looking complement to Impact Score — who will be valuable going forward, factoring in age, contract efficiency, and development trajectory.

48 / 100 #302 of 450
Cumulative Wins — 50% weight 43
Peak Ceiling — 20% weight 42
Contract Surplus — 30% weight 61
Future Value in line with current Impact (45)

League Percentile Profile

PPG
39
TS%
13
BPM
57
WS/48
61
RAPM
5
USG%
64
PA/100
19
BCI
75

Shot Quality

PA/100
-7.65
Points Added
-15.8
Selection
0.965
FGA
207
Zone Breakdown
Short Midrange
31.8%
44 FGA (21%)
Above Break Three
30.4%
92 FGA (44%)
Rim
52.5%
61 FGA (30%)
Long Midrange
40.0%
10 FGA (5%)

Creation & Scoring Load

Box Creation
14.19
Load Tier
Poor
Eff Delta
-4.7%
USG%
21.2%
Tendencies
Salary
$3.4M
Years Left
2
Expiry
2052
Option
Team Option
Status
-
Trade Value
0.397

Contract Breakdown

Season Salary Notes
2050-51 $3,400,000
2051-52 $3,400,000
Total Owed $6,800,000

Win Model Development

Win Model Score
2.885
Expected WM
2.977
Dev Residual
-0.0915
Peak Age
30
Peak Win Model
3.656
PA Tier
Medium
Upside Gap
0.5
Dev Status
Behind Curve
Win Model Score = sum(rating × coefficient) from multi-season Ridge regression (n=393, 11 seasons, 12/32 stable coefficients). Defense and shooting dominate. Unbiased across positions.

Win Model Trajectory

Most Similar Players

Player Team Age CA Similarity Archetype
M
Merlin Rooks Toronto Huskies 20 3.0 98.9% Primary Ballhandler / Point Of Attack
J
Jameer Morrow Philadelphia Warriors 20 3.0 98.8% Secondary Creator / Point Of Attack
L
Lincoln Rutherford St Louis Skyhawks 30 4.5 98.7% Primary Ballhandler / Point Of Attack
D
Devante Parker Jr Austin Rockets 29 4.5 98.6% Shot Creator / Point Of Attack
K
Kendrick Rudd Vancouver Wolves 29 4.0 98.6% Primary Ballhandler / Point Of Attack

Predicted Archetype

Offensive
Defensive

Win Value Development

Stage
Developing
Peak Age
29
Peak Win Value
15.1
Years to Peak
10
Current Win Value
11.3
Confidence
HIGH

Win Value Trajectory

Empirical Dev Curve (Multiverse)

Current WV
2.073
Projected Peak WV
2.764
Peak Age
29
Years to Peak
9
WV Growth
+0.691

Rating Trainability

Rating Current Growth/yr Class Peak Age
Foul Drawing 16 +1.23 High Growth 31
Help Defense 10 +0.66 High Growth 27
Off-Ball Defense 15 +0.55 High Growth 28
Ball Dominance 16 +0.55 High Growth 28
Gravity 16 +0.52 High Growth 29
Spacing 16 +0.45 High Growth 18
Post Execution 5 +0.40 High Growth 29
Playmaking 15 +0.40 High Growth 29
Stealing 15 +0.38 High Growth 19
Finishing 15 +0.37 High Growth 27
Defensive Rebounding 5 +0.37 High Growth 18
Offensive Rebounding 7 +0.36 High Growth 18
Strength 11 +0.35 High Growth 18
Pick & Roll Execution 11 +0.34 High Growth 18
Passing 12 +0.33 High Growth 18
Self-Creation 14 +0.32 High Growth 19
Isolation Execution 12 +0.32 High Growth 18
3PT Shooting 15 +0.31 High Growth 19
Ball Handling 15 +0.30 High Growth 19
On-Ball Perimeter Defense 16 +0.30 High Growth 18
Shoot Off Dribble 9 +0.28 Moderate Growth 18
Rim Protection 1 +0.26 Moderate Growth 18
Inside Shooting 15 +0.25 Moderate Growth 18
Post Defense 1 +0.17 Moderate Growth 18
Basketball IQ 12 +0.07 Low Growth 19
Endurance 8 +0.05 Low Growth 20
Speed 13 +0.01 Low Growth 18
Free Throws 19 +0.00 Unknown -
First Step 16 -0.01 Low Growth 18
Mid-Range Shooting 16 -0.03 Low Growth 19
Quickness 14 -0.08 Low Growth 19
Athleticism 17 -0.08 Low Growth 19
← Back to Roster